More than 4,000 registered nurses walked off the job at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston this morning, the largest nurses strike in Massachusetts history. Additionally, this morning, approximately 450 home care clinicians at Mass General Brigham Home Care, a separate arm of the hospital’s parent health system, began a seven-day strike of their own.
The hospital strike is a wage fight in a mature bargaining relationship. The home care strike is something different and arguably more significant: a first-contract fight by a bargaining unit that did not exist two years ago. For the many healthcare employers without a unionized workforce, this week is less a cautionary tale than a window into where healthcare labor organizing is heading and which workplace issues are driving these efforts.
Massachusetts Nurses Strike: What Is Happening?
The hospital’s nurses, represented by the Massachusetts Nurses Association, called a one-day strike after more than seven months of bargaining. Last month, 99.6% of them voted to authorize the walkout. Compensation is the headline dispute. The hospital’s nurses receive annual step increases for roughly their first 20 years of service; the fight is over whether the hospital will keep layering cost-of-living raises on top of those steps.
The union’s demands extend beyond wages, including more affordable health insurance, greater plan choice, limits on the use of temporary travel nurses, and protections for service lines the system has cut. The hospital says its nurses are already the highest paid in the state. The union points to the system’s financial performance and executive compensation.
The nurses are striking for one day and said they were prepared to return immediately the next morning. However, the hospital’s parent system hired approximately 1,300 travel nurses under contracts carrying a five-day minimum and announced that strikers would not return to work until the following Monday.
The home care clinicians, also represented by the Massachusetts Nurses Association, are in a different fight. Their unit of registered nurses, occupational and physical therapists, speech-language pathologists, social workers, and dietitians voted to unionize in June 2024 and have been negotiating their first contract since March 2025.
After a 92% strike authorization vote in May, the clinicians walked out for seven days seeking caseload limits, transparent productivity standards, and higher wages, citing burnout and turnover driven by unmanageable caseloads. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey convened both sides at the State House two days before the walkout. The meeting ended without a resolution.
Why Healthcare Strikes Are Legally Different: The Section 8(g) Notice
Strikes at healthcare institutions operate under a legal framework that exists nowhere else in the private sector. When Congress extended the National Labor Relations Act to nonprofit hospitals in 1974, it recognized that a labor dispute in healthcare can affect patient care, so it built in a buffer. Under Section 8(g), a union must give a healthcare institution and federal mediators at least 10 days’ written notice before any strike or picketing, stating exactly when the action will begin. That 10-day window is what allowed Mass General Brigham to line up nearly 1,300 travel nurses and adjust operations before a single nurse hit the picket line.
The notice obligations start even earlier. A union seeking to terminate or modify an existing healthcare contract must give the employer 90 days’ notice and must notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) and the applicable state mediation agency 60 days in advance, longer periods than apply in any other industry. A newly organized unit bargaining for its first contract, like the home care clinicians, must give FMCS and the applicable state mediation agency 30 days’ notice of the dispute before it can even issue the 10-day strike notice. These are not technicalities: an employee who strikes during a required notice period can lose the Act’s protections, including protection against discharge.
The One-Day Strike and the Five-Day Lockout
The hospital strike also illustrates a tactical dynamic now common in hospital labor disputes. Unions increasingly favor short-duration strikes, which demonstrate resolve while limiting members’ lost wages. Employers tend to respond by engaging replacement staffing agencies whose contracts carry multi-day minimums, then declining to reinstate strikers until the replacement commitment runs out. The result here is that a one-day strike will keep the hospital’s nurses out for five days.
Employers generally may hire temporary replacements to continue operations during an economic strike, and hospitals responding to short-duration strikes have generally been permitted to hold strikers out for the duration of a bona fide replacement staffing contract. However, the lawfulness of any particular lockout is fact-specific and depends on the employer’s motivation and the legitimacy of its business justification. The financials are sobering for both sides. Replacement staff command premium rates, and a system that spends heavily on a five-day staffing bridge has often spent more than the disputed raise would have cost. There is also a pointed irony here: one of the union’s contract demands is a limit on the hospital’s use of travel nurses, the very workforce now staffing the hospital through the strike. But the tactics at the hospital are not the real story here.
Why the Mass General Brigham Home Care Strike Matters More
The most important development in this dispute is easy to miss. The home care clinicians on strike this week were not union members three years ago. They organized in June 2024, part of an acceleration of healthcare-sector organizing that has spread well beyond inpatient nursing into home health, outpatient clinics, therapy services, and physician practices. Occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, social workers, and dietitians are precisely the categories of professional staff that most employers have historically considered unlikely to organize.
The issues that carried the organizing campaign are worth attention because they are not unique to unionized workplaces. Unmanageable caseloads, opaque productivity standards, and compensation that has not kept pace with the complexity of the work exist in non-union agencies and practices across the industry. Employees rarely organize because a union finds them; they organize because unresolved workplace frustrations make the union’s pitch persuasive.
Practical Takeaway for Non-Union Healthcare Employers
Non-union healthcare employers should treat this strike as a prompt for an internal review.
Useful questions include: (1) whether caseload and productivity expectations are documented, transparent, and defensible; (2) whether wage structures have kept pace with the market and whether compression between new hires and tenured staff is breeding resentment; (3) whether employees have a genuine internal channel for raising staffing and patient-safety concerns; and (4) whether front-line supervisors, who are almost always the first to hear organizing talk, understand what they lawfully may and may not say and do in response.
Employers have their greatest flexibility to improve wages, standards, and communication before any organizing activity begins; once a campaign is underway, the law significantly constrains what an employer can change and even what it can promise.
How Can Frier Levitt Help Healthcare Employers?
Frier Levitt is a boutique healthcare law firm that counsels hospitals, health systems, home health and hospice agencies, physician practices, and life sciences companies on the workforce issues these disputes implicate. We advise both unionized and non-union employers, and we understand that the best labor relations strategy is built long before a petition or a Section 8(g) notice arrives.
Frier Levitt assists healthcare employers with workforce self-assessments and compensation structure reviews, supervisor training on lawful responses to organizing activity, handbook and policy review, strike contingency planning, and collective bargaining and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proceedings when they come. Contact Frier Levitt today for a review of your organization’s labor relations readiness.
Senior Associate
